We are in a time of reconstruction and reformation in the Charismatic movement. As faulty doctrines are being uprooted and compromised leadership cracks are being exposed, it may appear that the House of God is in disrepair. The fault lines and cracks are leaving quite a mess, with a majority of the Church avoiding the rubble.
And yet, there are those who feel called to deal with the rubble because they see something else. They see a rebuilding commencing. They see what all of this has been “unto.” The sins in the camp are coming to the light so that the Bride can be cleansed and purified. That which has been broken and outdated is being cleared out so that the upgrades can begin. There is a “Charismatic reformation” happening that may seem painful, but is bringing us back to a righteous standard of leadership in the Church. God Himself is reminding us of our charge and calling us to take account.
And your ancient ruins shall be rebuilt; you shall raise up the foundations of many generations; you shall be called the repairer of the breach, the restorer of streets to dwell in.
There has been a cry from the next generation for reforms. There is a longing to contend for the prophetic ministry and the gifts of the Spirit, but within the boundaries of sound doctrine, biblical integrity, and leadership accountability. The excesses and compromise must give way to protocols and practices that are not only biblically sound but bear lasting fruit with life-giving power.
Knowing that the internet has the ability to glean information instantly and even summarize reports and writings concerning various issues, I used ChatGPT for some research. What I found was fascinating. Using the analogy of old and new wineskins, the research reported and compared practices from the “old system” along with reforms suggested for the new. You can decide if this research is accurate…
Charismatic Reform: Old Wineskins vs New Wineskins
Recent exposures of sin and failure among high-profile Charismatic leaders have sparked renewed calls for accountability, integrity, and structural reform across the broader church. Many voices within and outside the Charismatic movement are urging a move toward healthier leadership models, spiritual maturity, and theological soundness. The analogy of new wineskins (Matthew 9:17; Mark 2:22; Luke 5:37–38) powerfully illustrates the need for reform—not just in behavior, but in the structures and paradigms that support the life of the Church.
OLD WINESKIN PRACTICES IN THE CHARISMATIC MOVEMENT THAT NEED REFORM:
Celebrity Culture & Personality-Driven Ministries
Old Wineskin: Elevating leaders as untouchable anointed figures who are above correction, often creating cults of personality.
Result: Isolation, lack of accountability, and moral failure.
New Wineskin: Team-based leadership emphasizing servanthood, mutual accountability, and transparency (1 Peter 5:1–3; 1 Corinthians 3:5–7).
Lack of Accountable Leadership Structures
Old Wineskin: Independent ministries without oversight or submission to peers or broader church bodies.
Result: Leaders become insulated and unchallenged.
New Wineskin: Eldership, shared governance, and submission to outside counsel (Acts 15:6; Proverbs 11:14).
Overemphasis on Spiritual Power over Character
Old Wineskin: Valuing gifting, charisma, and supernatural manifestations more than the fruit of the Spirit and godly character.
Result: Leaders are promoted quickly without proven integrity (1 Timothy 3:1–7; Galatians 5:22–23).
New Wineskin: Re-centering discipleship around spiritual maturity, humility, and the fruit of the Spirit.
Financial Opacity & Prosperity Abuse
Old Wineskin: Unchecked wealth accumulation, lavish lifestyles, and manipulation of sowing/reaping theology.
Result: Scandals, loss of credibility, and exploitation of the vulnerable.
New Wineskin: Transparent financial practices, modesty, and generosity in leadership (Titus 1:7; 1 Timothy 6:6–10).
Authoritarian and Abusive Leadership
Old Wineskin: Control-based leadership masked as “spiritual authority,” where questioning is seen as rebellion.
Result: Emotional, spiritual, and psychological abuse.
New Wineskin: Shepherding leadership that empowers, protects, and listens to the flock (John 10:11–14; Ezekiel 34:1–10).
Hype-Driven Culture with Little Theological Depth
Old Wineskin: High-energy experiences that lack scriptural grounding or theological stability.
Result: Shallow discipleship and susceptibility to error.
New Wineskin: Worship and Word in balance; building disciples rooted in truth and wisdom (Colossians 2:6–8; Hebrews 5:12–14).
Reform Suggestions Emerging in the Broader Church
- Restoration of Biblical Eldership and Accountability – Replacing solo-leader models with councils of qualified elders. Encouraging cross-denominational accountability structures.
- Slow and Tested Leadership Development – Emphasis on mentoring, proven character, and gradual promotion (1 Timothy 5:22).
- Ethical and Transparent Ministry Practices – Clear financial disclosures, board oversight, and ethical fundraising standards.
- Theological Reformation within the Charismatic Movement – Training in sound doctrine to support spiritual experiences with biblical foundations.
- Creating Safe Environments for Whistleblowers and Victims – Establishing processes for reporting abuse without fear of retaliation.
- Repentance and Healing-Oriented Culture – Public repentance, humility, and a return to Christ-centered leadership.
Conclusion: Why the New Wineskin Is Essential
Jesus said, “No one pours new wine into old wineskins… the wine will burst the skins” (Luke 5:37). The new wine—a fresh move of God, deeper purity, and a reformed Church—requires a new wineskin: structures, mindsets, and practices that can carry His glory without breaking under the weight of old patterns.
This reform is not a rejection of the Charismatic emphasis on the Holy Spirit, but a refinement—where power is submitted to purity, and gifting is governed by godliness. The Church is being invited into a season of divine pruning so it may bear lasting fruit (John 15:2). The question is not just whether we want revival, but whether we are willing to become vessels that can carry it well.
Comments are closed.